PoliticsWorld Events

Hidden Truth About Nunes’ Memo Revealed?

The recent controversy over the voracity of Devin Nunes’ memo has hidden confirmation that needs to be pursued.

Once the public was made aware of the (House Intelligence Committee Chair, Devin Nunes (R-CA)) 4-page memo that is supposedly so explosive it deserves public release, despite its confidential source-data, the opposition started circling the wagons.

Those on the GOP side who actually read the memo called it shocking, troubling, and alarming.

Initially, the leading Democrat response came from Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, and Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA). Their response was to focus on Russian interference (again) by writing a letter to Facebook and Twitter blaming Russian bots for the #releasethememo movement.

Rep. Schiff (D-CA) also announce that Democrats have drafted their own rebuttal memo aimed at exposing Republican mischaracterizations of the classified information tied to the Mueller Russian collusion probe.

Then, Assistant Attorney General Steven Boyd stepped in to voice his concern, calling the potential memo release “extremely reckless.”

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION: If the Nunez memo is about corruption within the DOJ and FBI, why should they be entrusted to review the information prior to release?

In response, Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC), also a member of the House Intelligence Committee, weighed in regarding Boyd’s warning, specifically with regard to Boyd’s judgment prior to actually reading the memo.

“I mean, I would say this again. I like Stephen. I work well with him,” Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, replied. “It’s really difficult to say a memo is reckless when you haven’t read it. To the extent he says that they’ve seen no evidence of any impropriety or untowardness or inappropriate conduct during the process we just respectfully disagree.”

Who’s telling the truth? Is there a vast conspiracy against President Trump as the Nunez memo may suggest, or does the truth lie on the other side, namely that the Republicans are simply trying to distract from the real truth of Trump-Russian collusion?

Maybe there are other seemingly unrelated clues that may shed light on who’s really telling the truth.

According to an article in the Jerusalem Post, former Secretary of State John Kerry seems to be angling for a 2020 presidential run, and in trying to remain politically relevant, met with a close associate of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Hussein Agha, regarding the Jerusalem declaration and ongoing peace negotiations. During the meeting, Kerry apparently made some potentially damaging remarks.

“According to Kerry, Trump will not remain in office for a long time. It was reported that Kerry said that within a year there was a good chance that Trump would not be in the White House… Kerry hinted that many in the American establishment, as well as in American intelligence, are dissatisfied with Trump’s performance and the way he leads their country.”

As someone who was a senior official in the Obama administration when the alleged misdeeds began, maybe we should pay attention to Mr. Kerry.

Tell us (and others) what you think.

This is what others think

Help us improve the quality of our content by offering an honest rating and leaving a comment below.

User Rating: 4.55 ( 1 votes)
Show More

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. Our classified material has already been leaked by Hillary and others. The FBI has a track record of loosing material. If the information was against President Trump, it would already have been released. If the information is against our country, president, and our freedom, we need to see it and see who is involved, no matter who they are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Close
Close